[ncc-services-wg] [address-policy-wg] 2012-05 Proposal Accepted - Request for Clarification
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [ncc-announce] [news] RPKI and PI End Users Proposal - Feedback Requested
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [address-policy-wg] 2012-05 Proposal Accepted - Request for Clarification
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Wed Feb 13 13:04:41 CET 2013
Hi, On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 03:55:30PM +0100, Emilio Madaio wrote: >The updated RIPE document is ripe-577 and is available at: > >https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-577 ripe-577 contains, in S5.5 the sentence: "Re-allocated blocks will be signed to establish the current allocation owner." What does this refer to? Does this mean these blocks will *mandatorily* be signed with a RPKI certificate and, if yes, how does that square with the NCC's stated policy that RPKI certs will always be voluntary? Regards, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [ncc-announce] [news] RPKI and PI End Users Proposal - Feedback Requested
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [address-policy-wg] 2012-05 Proposal Accepted - Request for Clarification
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]