[ncc-services-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal (Openness about Policy Violations)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal (Openness about Policy Violations)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal (Openness about Policy Violations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Sat Feb 16 23:44:24 CET 2013
Hi all, >> Nope, no way, not unless a violation is determined - akin to being found >> guilty in a court of law. >> >> Also, the identity of the submitter MUST be published even in this case. >> No anonymity for snitches, the Stasi wasn't *that* long ago > > Ok, and this even more so. I am ending this thread right now. Ok, that was probably too strong. I do want this discussion to take place. I wrote this first version of the policy proposal for maximum openness. And I see the potential risks with openly publishing complaints. I want the community to determine where the limits are in regard to publishing complaints etc. I didn't really expect everyone to agree to the current text. But I did not expect such language and comparisons on this list, and it shocked me. As one of the proposers I ask you to please participate in a constructive discussion here to see what is possible and desirable and what is not. Thank you, Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal (Openness about Policy Violations)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal (Openness about Policy Violations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]