[ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at netability.ie
Mon Feb 25 11:16:14 CET 2013
On 25/02/2013 09:56, Daniel Stolpe wrote: > Yes. And when the owners want an update they may be locked in the process > och showing that they are in fact the right owners. We have a customer, a > large corporate group that everybody in my country knows about and I would > even say most people would agree that the original owner of a /16 is now > part of this group and ask no further questions but what documentation is > there now from a merger in 2000? Probably lots if they were large enough to get a /16. The flip side of this argument could be taken as: this holder's interest in maintaining their /16 (i.e. probably infrastructure which is very important to their business) is so small that in a period of 13 years, they couldn't be bothered spending a couple of hours updating the registry details for it. Leaving things for so long in a situation like this is likely to cause difficulties, but registrants have a duty of care to their infrastructure. I appreciate that this causes classification difficulties. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]