[ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at netability.ie
Mon Feb 25 11:28:30 CET 2013
On 25/02/2013 10:21, Gert Doering wrote: > If everything works, why would they need to even think about it? e.g. to provide a credible means of rescue in the case of registry hijacking? A /16 isn't a €9.99 kettle which you can easily replace down in the local hardware shop. > So I'm not sure why a PI /16 holder would have more need for updates, > if nothing changed... The whole point is that something has changed in the situation that Daniel referred to: the legal name of the resource holder. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]