[ncc-services-wg] [address-policy-wg] Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [address-policy-wg] Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Wed Jun 12 11:10:26 CEST 2013
Виталий Туровец wrote: > I must admit that i myself as PI holder and service operator completely > agree with Dan and think that RPKI certification should be somehow > achievable by PI holders themselves without need to do any kinds of > requests to LIR. So it seems you are meking a cse for a direct service relationship with the NCC, and not using the concept of the "Sponsoring LIR"? Wilfried. > 2013/6/10 Dan Luedtke <maildanrl at gmail.com <mailto:maildanrl at gmail.com>> > > > As you may have seen, I’ve created a policy proposal to ask the > RIPE NCC to > > allow Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC member resource > holders. (IXP > > / Legacy space and PI space holders) > > As a PI holder and a router operator I support this proposal. I want > others be able to verify my prefixes. > > RPKI, if used widely, can be a much more acurate source for routing > information than the databases are. Even in RIPE region, where the > database tends to be well maintained. The more resource holders are > allowed to use RPKI, the better. I would even pay a fee for the > signing process of my resources, just in case this is about money. > -- [...] > ~~~ > WBR, > Vitaliy Turovets > NOC Lead @TV-Net ISP > +38(093)265-70-55 > VITU-RIPE > X-NCC-RegID: ua.tv <http://ua.tv>
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [address-policy-wg] Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]