[ncc-services-wg] [coms] Certifying of PI End User Address Space
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [coms] Certifying of PI End User Address Space
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [coms] Certifying of PI End User Address Space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fearghas McKay
fearghas at gmail.com
Mon Mar 18 15:50:30 CET 2013
Andrew On 18 Mar 2013, at 14:44, Andrew de la Haye <ripencc-management at ripe.net> wrote: > To answer your first question, option 3 would require more resources than option 1 because it would require the RIPE NCC to create new processes for handling non-members. The NCC already sure has a large number of people in the dB who are non-members ? Some of whom will hold resources as well as being contacts ? Is the use case so drastically different ? Regards Fearghas
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [coms] Certifying of PI End User Address Space
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [coms] Certifying of PI End User Address Space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]