[ncc-services-wg] 2013-04 New Policy Proposal (Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2013-04 New Policy Proposal (Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2013-04 New Policy Proposal (Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Mon May 20 18:43:09 CEST 2013
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 06:23:16PM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote: >I just read the Regulation you mentioned but I fail to see how >this would even apply to anything mentioned in this discussion... That's why I asked a lawyer. In simple words: The NCC is vulnerable to court orders from anywhere within the EU. >>> Ah, ok. But since your assumption is invalid (there is no default, >>> and the quick-start examples which would probably be used for such a >>> "lazy default" are completely different from what you assume) then >>> your case isn't very interesting to discuss any further. [citation needed] >> There may not be a default *yet*, but there will be and it will be >> "drop if invalid/missing" because that is much easier to understand >> ifor the decision-makers than localprefs, metrics, etc. >Ok, now you are making even more unfounded assumptions. Please stop Well, if you can see the future any better than I, please enlighten us. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2013-04 New Policy Proposal (Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2013-04 New Policy Proposal (Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]