[ncc-services-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-08 Review Period extended until 1 October 2013 (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-08 Review Period extended until 1 October 2013 (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-08 Review Period extended until 1 October 2013 (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Freedman
david.freedman at uk.clara.net
Thu Sep 12 14:15:05 CEST 2013
> >> And I suspect that this is the ulterior motivation for this proposal. >>Self >> censorship on the part of the LIR. > >Sorry to disappoint, but no ulterior motives. As author of the proposal, >my concern is transparency and openness of registration information which >has served us well over the last twentysomething years. As a co-author, I'd like to chime in and mirror Nick's statement, for me it started as a frustration that the data couldn't be accessed easily (or without the assistance of the NCC). I think such openness and transparency is becoming increasingly more important in our industry. I see this as a step forwards, and not backwards. Dave.
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-08 Review Period extended until 1 October 2013 (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-08 Review Period extended until 1 October 2013 (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]