[ncc-services-wg] 2023-03 Voluntary Transfer Lock
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2023-03 Voluntary Transfer Lock
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2023-03 Voluntary Transfer Lock
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
denis walker
ripedenis at gmail.com
Wed May 24 17:03:43 CEST 2023
Hi all I also previously objected to this. I still think it is more logical to add it to the transfer policy. But Athina convinced me there is no conflict between two policies, especially if a line is added to each explaining how they work together. So I support this moving forward. Cheers Denis Co-chair DB-WG On Wed, 24 May 2023, 15:41 Leo Vegoda, <leo at vegoda.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I support this proposal. > > I previously questioned whether this should be a policy or just a > service implementation. I now understand why it needs to be a policy > (thanks, Athina!). > > Kind regards, > > Leo > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ncc-services-wg > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-services-wg/attachments/20230524/4f653013/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2023-03 Voluntary Transfer Lock
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2023-03 Voluntary Transfer Lock
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]