eof-wg vs eof-list (was Re: Various reports posted here)

> My suggestion would be to ask Geoff to cease posting to routing-wg
> (but keep eof-list) and ask APNIC to post to EOF-list instead.
> 
> How do people feel about that? Does that make sense?

It certainly does, and I second it.

A strange thing I noticed though is that eof-list mailing
list is apparently deprecated since 2002, and eof-wg is
supposed to be used instead (as this is the name of the
_archived_ mailing list). However, Geoff does send his
report to eof-list and in spite of this it gets archived
in the eof-wg list. Moreover, the mailing list information
associated with the EOF mailing list says that one should
send the e-mails to eof-list at ripe.net...

Is there any reason to have the _name_ eof-wg list at all,
or should this be renamed to eof-list? (I suspect there was
a historical reason for using eof-wg, as EOF was thought
to become a working group, but as far as I know, such a
WG never existed in the last 10 years.)

The change suggested by Daniel Roesen may be a good
opportunity to deprecate eof-wg and switch back to
eof-list. I would ask the same question:

How do people feel about that? Does that make sense?

Janos