[routing-wg] Annoucing supernets in BGP?
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Annoucing supernets in BGP?
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Annoucing supernets in BGP?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos M. martinez
carlosm3011 at gmail.com
Tue Sep 11 17:42:46 CEST 2012
I get the point and I basically agree, but anyways, I'm still curious about what network dynamics might be at play here that make the covering announcement a source of problems. My question is strictly technical, I don't want to delve into the 'policy/authority' part of it (at this time at least :-) ) regards Carlos On 9/11/12 12:39 PM, Gert Doering wrote: > hi, > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:23:15PM -0300, Carlos M. martinez wrote: >> Are your trobules traceable to the covering announcement? More specifics >> should always win, period. Regardless even of BGP attributes, so I'm >> curious if your issues are traceable to the /5. > > That's sort of missing the point. Do not announce what you have no > authority over. > > And filter your downstream customers, using a mechanism that is based > on strong authentication. > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster >
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Annoucing supernets in BGP?
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Annoucing supernets in BGP?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]