[routing-wg] https://blog.surfnet.nl/?p=3159
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] https://blog.surfnet.nl/?p=3159
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Weekly Routing Table Report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jac Kloots
Jac.Kloots at surfnet.nl
Wed Feb 5 13:07:07 CET 2014
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014, Randy Bush wrote: > hi jac, > >> Are more people willing to look into their traffic patterns and do a >> similar analysis? I would be very interested in the results. > > make it easy, give them a tool. I wish I could.. there is no single tool in which this analysis can be done. I can provide a step-by-step guide for what I did if people are willing to do the same analysis. >> I also sent a message to nordunet to fix stuff before publishing this >> article. > > they're on it. it is their test space, which confuses them a bit. > >>> since renater seems not to care enough to clean up their mess, and >>> they have been asked many many times, imiho, the ncc should just >>> delete the over-reaching ROA(s). >> :) > > draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting-04.txt We're touching the delicate area of aggregation and de-aggregation here. Hopefully the sponsoring-LIR construction can also aid in certifying resources from more specific routes from a different AS than the AS where the aggregeted route is announced from. Jac -- Jac Kloots Network Services SURFnet bv
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] https://blog.surfnet.nl/?p=3159
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Weekly Routing Table Report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]