[routing-wg] Routing Working Group charter refresh
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Routing Working Group charter refresh
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Weekly Routing Table Report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Job Snijders
job.snijders at hibernianetworks.com
Thu Mar 6 19:40:26 CET 2014
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 03:35:12PM +0000, João Damas wrote: > Dear all, > > The Routing Working Group chairs have spent some time thinking about > the refresh of the Working Group’s outdated charter and would like to > discuss our thoughts with the list. For reference, the current > Charter is pasted below: > > =============================================================== The > Routing Working Group defined the RIPE Routing Registry and promoted > it worldwide. The WG exchanges information about the various Routing > Registries. It is concerned with the growth of routing tables on the > Internet and is working to decrease their size in Europe. Anyone with > an interest in routing is welcome to observe and participate. To post > a message to the list, send an email to routing-wg at ripe.net. Please > note that only subscribers can post messages. > =============================================================== > > and this is our initial suggestion: > > =============================================================== > The Routing Working Group is concerned with all aspects of IP routing > technologies. This includes dissemination and discussion of issues > affecting operators, new technologies and new applications of current > technologies, and discussion of concerns relevant to inter and > intra-AS routing. Good! > The Routing Working Group is also the forum for discussion of those > aspects of RIPE DB evolution related to network configuration, in > particular those referred to as the Internet Routing Registry. This > activity is carried out in coordination with the RIPE DB wg and other > IRRs This paragraph is not befitting in my honest opinion. I fail to understand the purpose and intents. > The Routing Working Group aims to produce Best Common Practive > documents related to the above issues. Will you set milestones and targets? Kind regards, Job -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 873 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/attachments/20140306/70458438/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Routing Working Group charter refresh
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Weekly Routing Table Report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]