[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Oliver Bartels
oliver at bartels.de
Thu Mar 31 16:40:41 CEST 2005
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:20:21 +0100, Michael.Dillon at radianz.com wrote: >We have enough knowledge of intercontinental cable routes >today in order to design a geographical aggregation topology. Do you *really* think anyone is willing to invest *real* money into a *real* project for a geographical aggregation topology ? Especially as switching and digging new cables can be avoided by putting a bit more computing power into these boxes called routers ? And all this in a world, where certain "we think we are big" operators are refusing peerings with smaller ISP's ? Do you *really* think these "big is best" policy operators would change their dominating policy for a geographical concept ? Best Regards Oliver Bartels Oliver Bartels F+E + Bartels System GmbH + 85435 Erding, Germany oliver at bartels.de + http://www.bartels.de + Tel. +49-8122-9729-0
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]