[address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Streater
tim.streater at dante.org.uk
Mon Nov 21 18:21:53 CET 2005
At 09:52 18/11/2005, Jeroen Massar wrote: >If you are really too small, that is you have at most 10 sites, then you >simply are too small. Actually two sites at present. But I wouldn't call a network that will provide v6 transit for the NRENs of a dozen or so Mediterranean countries "small", in the sense of significance. As I said, I haven't looked at this issue for a while, but I do recall that the policy was: 1) Getting space required the 200 customer plan 2) No PI space for v6 If this is the stated policy, doesn't seem much point in making an enquiry. If I were able to get the space, (1), and (2) notwithstanding, what would be the point of the policy? The present policy models a small portion of reality, and appears to leave major portions unprovided for, as others e-mails have attested. -- Tim
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]