[address-policy-wg] RE: Question
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: Question
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: Question
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Apr 24 10:59:47 CEST 2006
Hi, On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 10:52:43AM +0200, Oliver Bartels wrote: > This argument is absolutely correct, the impact on the BGP table > will be negligible and can - as proven by IPv4 - be handled by modern > routing hardware, thus: Does someone have numbers on the amount of IPv6 prefixes that currently deployed Cisco and Juniper routers can handle? I know that the Cisco Sup720/3B can handle 256k routes for IPv4+IPv6 *together* (TCAM space), which limits the "unlimited growth of IPv6" a bit (but which can be fixed by upgrading to 3BXL). Please let's not discuss "how stupid router vendors are" now, just collect facts - there must be some upper limits in the hardware for GSR line cards and Juniper IPII-ASICs as well. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 92315 SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: Question
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: Question
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]