[address-policy-wg] IPv4-HD-Ratio proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4-HD-Ratio proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4-HD-Ratio proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fernando García
fgarcia at eurocomercial.es
Thu Apr 27 11:31:25 CEST 2006
I support Thor-Henrik views and opinions. Regards, Fernando El 27/04/2006, a las 10:48, Thor-Henrik Kvandahl escribió: > > Hi all, > > here are my *personal* opinion on this proposal. > > I do not support this proposal, and my reasons for this are: > > * This proposal increases the rate of consumption of IPv4. > * It favourises the large ISPs. > * In the presentation on RIPE 52, Tuesday by Filiz Yilmaz, we where > told > that this proposal was abandoned by ARIN and APNIC, and one > representative from LacNIC also stood up and expressed their > conserns. > I have not heard anything from AfriNIC, but I cannot see why they > would > want to implement this policy. I feel if will be arrogant of the > RIPE > community to disregard the other RIRs conserns and implement this > policy. > > And I also have to agree with Gert Doering who said in the address > policy > WG that there has been very quiet around this proposal, and that the > reason for this can be that ETNO claims thay "unanimously support this > proposal". > > -- > Thor-Henrik Kvandahl > no.telenor > > ------------------------------------------------ Fernando Garcia |Tel: +34 91 4359687 EUROCOMERCIAL I&C SA |Fax: +34 91 4313240 Valentín Beato, 5 |e-mail: fgarcia at eurocomercial.es E-28037 Madrid | Spain |http://www.eurocomercial.es
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4-HD-Ratio proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4-HD-Ratio proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]