[address-policy-wg] IPv4-HD-Ratio proposal
- Previous message (by thread): VS: [address-policy-wg] IPv4-HD-Ratio proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-02 New Draft Document Published (IP Assignments for anycasting DNS)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thor-Henrik Kvandahl
thk at telenor.net
Wed May 3 09:54:10 CEST 2006
Hi all. If issues regarding rfc2050 has been discussed before, then please excuse me. I see that ARIN and LACNIC has discussed rfc2050 conflicts in this proposal, but I cannot remember that this topic is discussed in the RIPE region. This proposal breaks the 80% rule in rfc2050. The proposal mentions the 80% rule, but it does not mention or discuss the fact that this rule is stated in rfc 2050. The proposal says: d. Arguments opposing the proposal. This proposal will have some limited impact on IPV4 address consumption. I think conflicts with rfc2050 also should have been listed in the proposal item d. -- Thor-Henrik Kvandahl no.telenor On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Thor-Henrik Kvandahl wrote: > > Hi all, > > here are my *personal* opinion on this proposal. > > I do not support this proposal, and my reasons for this are: > > * This proposal increases the rate of consumption of IPv4. > * It favourises the large ISPs. > * In the presentation on RIPE 52, Tuesday by Filiz Yilmaz, we where told > that this proposal was abandoned by ARIN and APNIC, and one > representative from LacNIC also stood up and expressed their conserns. > I have not heard anything from AfriNIC, but I cannot see why they would > want to implement this policy. I feel if will be arrogant of the RIPE > community to disregard the other RIRs conserns and implement this policy. > > And I also have to agree with Gert Doering who said in the address policy > WG that there has been very quiet around this proposal, and that the > reason for this can be that ETNO claims thay "unanimously support this > proposal". > > -- > Thor-Henrik Kvandahl > no.telenor >
- Previous message (by thread): VS: [address-policy-wg] IPv4-HD-Ratio proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-02 New Draft Document Published (IP Assignments for anycasting DNS)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]