[address-policy-wg]RE: [address-policy-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 - Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 – Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] SPAM filtering at RIPE NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
s.steffann at computel.nl
Thu Nov 9 16:06:01 CET 2006
Hi, > I only mentioned some concern about no slow-start mechanism > at all, but basically a per-LIR AW doesn't make much sense > anyways. Usuallly "older", "bigger" LIRs have quite some > "high" AW already, even if they have a high fluctuation > of LIR-contacts/hostmasters, too (students ect.) > So, personally, the current AW doesn't tell that much about > quality of Assignments made anyways - it's quite obsolete > from this p.o.v. That is true. In assignment window for new LIR's would make some sense, just to make sure that they don't do anything silly because of a misunderstanding. There is a big chance that nobody in the organisation has experience in running an LIR. They might even still be thinking in classes... (in my experience a lot of people don't read documents until they have to, so they might have ignored CIDR until now) Letting them start (for a short time) with an AW of /25 will probably make them aware :) Just some thoughts.. Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 – Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] SPAM filtering at RIPE NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]