[address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Sep 18 17:52:51 CEST 2006
Hi, On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 06:47:48PM +0100, Andy Davidson wrote: > If we accept argument that we should, as a community, advocate no > smaller PI assignments smaller than a /24 because of table > filtration, what happens when the table grows to the size that > operators start to filter on longer masks ? In that case, PI receipients holding a /24 suddenly are without connectivity to these networks - and will start yelling at RIPE. Which is basically the point while RIPE (and the RIPE NCC) has previously always refused to make any statements regarding the routeability of a given network size. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 94488 SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]