[address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
president at ukraine.su
Thu Sep 21 19:27:06 CEST 2006
Andy Davidson wrote: > You're opening up a huge can of worms here. > 'Getting back IPs' means > contacting peers and upstreams and telling these parties to stop > accepting the announcement from the non-paying company. If the company > is still paying bills to their upstreams, do you think upstreams will > take kindly to this action ? > The RIPE NCC deleting the inetnum object doesn't mean the addresses stop > routing ... It means. Just because of this space will not be routed in the world. RR DB is a good thing! ;) -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]