[address-policy-wg] 2006-02 Last Call for Comments (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-02 Last Call for Comments (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-02 Last Call for Comments (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie
Wed Jun 27 10:33:12 CEST 2007
On 27 Jun 2007, at 00:41, Jeroen Massar wrote: > See the various other discussions about ULA-C I have, and I'm disappointed by what seems to me, on both (all?) sides to be a combination of hidden agendas, prejudice, grandstanding, and refusal to acknowledge that the opposing argument may even be made in good faith. > and the amount of > questions that have been raised and remain unanswered and start > tapping > into that and answering them, then we can proceed with that part. Upto > now those questions remain open and as such there actually is not > even a > real case at all why such space should exist, except for some people > wanting to have "really cheap PI" space for vaguely defined examples. > > And that case can be solved by what Gert proposed, thus then there > really is no need any more for ULA-C. Simply repeating your opinion isn't going to convince me that it has a real basis. Best regards, Niall O'Reilly University College Dublin IT Services PGP key ID: AE995ED9 (see www.pgp.net) Fingerprint: 23DC C6DE 8874 2432 2BE0 3905 7987 E48D AE99 5ED9 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20070627/8f7c89fb/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-02 Last Call for Comments (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-02 Last Call for Comments (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]