Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Previous message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hisham R Rojoa
hisham at afrinic.net
Tue May 29 14:43:08 CEST 2007
Please see below again for the AfriNIC region: ------------------------------------------------- '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 ------------------------------------------------- Alloc 10 8 27 28 21 20 43 82 105 Assigned 1 1 0 9 11 11 6 20 19 ------------------------------------------------- rgds ernest -----Original Message----- From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering Sent: 29 May 2007 14:56 To: Hisham R Rojoa Cc: 'Ricardo Patara'; 'Mohacsi Janos'; 'Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet'; 'Sascha Lenz'; address-policy-wg at ripe.net Subject: Re: Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations) Hi, On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:43:53PM +0400, Hisham R Rojoa wrote: > If this helps, here is some data from the AfriNIC region: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Year '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > PI /16 0 0 0 0.09 0.33 0.34 0.18 1.41 1.74 > PA /16 1.81 1.13 3.88 5.81 3.70 3.06 7.58 14.36 39.82 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- Actually, the *number* of allocations would be more relevant for PI vs. PA than the sheer size. In the RIPE region, we have seen that there is much less *space* being used for PI - but it is much more fragmented, thus causing more pain in the routing tables. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 113403 SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.1/822 - Release Date: 28/05/2007 11:40
- Previous message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]