[address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Wed May 30 18:36:56 CEST 2007
Lutz Donnerhacke wrote: > * Jørgen Hovland wrote: > >>>* Jørgen Hovland wrote: >>> >>>>Q: Is it correct that you can get a /26 IPv4 PA block, but you can't get >>>>a /96 IPv6 PA block? Why is that? >>> >>>It's not correct. /48, /56, /64, and /112 are the most common >>>assigments here. >> >>Which RIR is that? According to RIPEs IPv6 policy, the minimum PA block >>is /32 so I was kinda wondering. I need a /96. I can even manage with a >>/112. (Please let's not start a useless discussion of why you think I >>need it). > > > I talk about assignments, not about allocations. If you try to get a IPv4 PA > allocation from RIPE, I wonder how you will get a /26. All you can get is an > IPv4 PA assignment from your LIR with a size of /26. > > And now I am feeling royally mixed up... I thought we were discussing IPv6? Wilfried
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]