[address-policy-wg] 2008-05 New Draft Documents Published (Anycasting Assignments for TLDs and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 New Draft Documents Published (Anycasting Assignments for TLDs and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 New Draft Documents Published (Anycasting Assignments for TLDs and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Fri Apr 17 00:36:14 CEST 2009
>> i like "critical infrastructre." this is because, while i understand >> that the roots need golden space, and i can almost see that anycasted >> services need micro-allocations, i do not feel that tlds per se are >> critical in the sense that they need golden space. > that would suggest an external reference to the term and other evaluation > criteria than those proposed. > Also, could you elaborate on the difference between > "micro-allocations" and "golden space"? the use case for micro-allocation that ws used in arin, until cathy started screaming at me, was cnn. >> there is a reason the dns maps from names to addresses. use it. > Sure, we use anycast to support performant and resilient mapping. i have sympathy for the anycast need. i do not have sympathy for non-anycast tds, and i run a number of them. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 New Draft Documents Published (Anycasting Assignments for TLDs and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 New Draft Documents Published (Anycasting Assignments for TLDs and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]