[address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at marcoh.net
Wed Dec 2 08:53:40 CET 2009
On 2 dec 2009, at 08:49, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Marco Hogewoning wrote: > >> Let's not forget that I will probably announce my 6rd as more >> specifics to aid in load balancing traffic just as I do with my >> multiple IPv4 allocations. So routing table times 8 I guess, if >> we're lucky. >> >> I still find this a really bad idea, like Remco says everybody just >> happens to have plans for 6rd so if they please can get a /24, we >> might as well make it the default allocation size so people don't >> have to lie, uhhh be optismistic, about it. > > If we have separate space for /24 allocation policy then at least I > can filter the de-aggregation and stop some of the madness. Yeah and please make it a seperate policy then with hard words on actual deployment, you get the /24 and have 12 months to show up in google's statistics or you need to give it back. The same as some countries did with UMTS frequencies: use it or loose it. MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]