[address-policy-wg] Reopening discussion on RIPE Policy Proposal 2006-05
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reopening discussion on RIPE Policy Proposal 2006-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reopening discussion on RIPE Policy Proposal 2006-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Fri Jul 17 10:41:50 CEST 2009
Hi, On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 09:41:00AM +0300, Greg wrote: > It's not a bad proposal - there was a great discussion before. Having "great discussions" doesn't necessarily make it a *good* proposal either. The amount of discussions and mixed feedback we have seen tells me that we have no consenus yet to go forward with this proposal (not even "very rough"). I have on my TODO list to go through the PI numbers that Alex has posted and try to figure out how "real" this percieved problem is *today*, and then we can go forward with less emotional and more educated discussion. regards, Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 128645 SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reopening discussion on RIPE Policy Proposal 2006-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reopening discussion on RIPE Policy Proposal 2006-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]