[address-policy-wg] RE: Private address space in IPv4 and IPv6 [was something irrelevantly titled]
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: Private address space in IPv4 and IPv6 [was something irrelevantly titled]
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: Private address space in IPv4 and IPv6 [was something irrelevantly titled]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
poty at iiat.ru
poty at iiat.ru
Fri May 29 12:17:50 CEST 2009
Not each other, but all to some! From: David Freedman [mailto:david.freedman at uk.clara.net] Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 2:06 PM To: Potapov Vladislav; jeroen at unfix.org Cc: nick at inex.ie; frederic at placenet.org; address-policy-wg at ripe.net Subject: RE: [address-policy-wg] RE: Private address space in IPv4 and IPv6 [was something irrelevantly titled] >It's the problem of the merging banks or any other companies, not the >whole World. Why RIPE should do the work for them? I distill that argument down to "why should we help eachother", this is starting to go seriously off-topic now. Dave. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20090529/ada9f9db/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: Private address space in IPv4 and IPv6 [was something irrelevantly titled]
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: Private address space in IPv4 and IPv6 [was something irrelevantly titled]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]