[address-policy-wg] Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Mon Nov 22 17:14:57 CET 2010
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 16:25, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > For us, it is :-9 - I'm not sure whether the routing-wg folks are going > to like it... I would argue that the specific WGs would have the final say on anything relating to them (if we end up using WG-specific prefixes), anyway. For example, ripe-rt- would work nicely. > Regarding the specific proposal, I can certainly see why you'd want this, > and if there is enough backing here, I'll bring it up among the WG chairs > and the RIPE NCC to see what can be done about it. Thanks. Would/Should I write a proper proposal for that or would you just take it up directly? Richard PS: Yes, the RIPE is using RT for tickets, but I doubt they would want that namespace for RT.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]