[address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Fri Apr 15 11:33:31 CEST 2011
Hi, > I think this should be amended to clarify that PI space can be > assigned to employees, customers etc. independent of device ownership, > using services like RA, reflecting the previous discussion on this > list. To keep things manageable let's not combine different things in one proposal. I understand that there are many people who would like to 'no sub-assignments' part of the PI policy but that is a different issue than the multihoming requirement. Let's discuss that separately. Thanks, Sander APWG co-chair
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]