[address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fweimer at bfk.de
Wed Apr 20 15:01:31 CEST 2011
* Wilfried Woeber: > We should keep in mind that the RIPE NCC, working (+ charging for > its services) according to the policies as agreed by the Community > is NOT an internet tax and fund-redistribution entity! I agree wholeheartedly. > There is no way to redistribute a "FIB-entry-surcharge" to whatever > or whoever believes to "suffer" from this proposed change in policy. And more fine-grained routing choices often improve some desirable metrics globally, and not just locally at one site. In any case, update churn is reportedly the worse problem today. -- Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]