[address-policy-wg] Source of routing table growth
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Source of routing table growth
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Source of routing table growth
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Sun Jul 3 20:44:08 CEST 2011
On 7/2/11 9:35 AM, Masataka Ohta wrote: > Sander Steffann wrote: > >> Getting a good solution for this is _very_ important to limit >> routing table growth. Many people/organizations probably >> don't want the hassle of BGP if they can get more redundancy >> and less dependencies on a single ISP (easier renumbering >> will help too) in a simpler way. But this is IETF territory, >> not RIPE :-) > > IETF can do nothing unless ISPs of RIPE and other RIRs accept > the restriction that only very large ISPs can have their own > global routing table entries and address spaces of other ISPs > must be delegated from those of the very large ISPs. RIPE is not a place to discuss this, as RIPE is all about resources allocation and policies around that, not how resources are used. IETF is not a place to discuss that, as if we understand what IETF stands for - that's engineering body that makes protocols and standards, not how resources are used. So we need new institution for that, let's call it "Internet Routing Police". Should I start filling in the registration papers for new not-for-profit institute with that name? :) Cheers, Jan Zorz
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Source of routing table growth
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Source of routing table growth
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]