[address-policy-wg] The IANA contract and 2011-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The IANA contract and 2011-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
boggits
boggits at gmail.com
Mon Mar 21 19:08:09 CET 2011
On 21 March 2011 18:05, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote: > On 21 Mar 2011, at 16:48, boggits wrote: > >> Since we've had a joyful time with this proposal before, what happens >> if we pass it *but* ICANN fail to get the IANA contract this time round? > > Hopefully nothing. IANA will no doubt continue to implement the consensus > policies that have been developed by the community, just as it's always > done. I would expect that this would be a key condition of the IANA contract > being awarded to some other organisation. One would hope so, but the wording of the policy explicitly references the organisation, a minor wordsmithing to take this into account could resolve that... J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The IANA contract and 2011-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]