[address-policy-wg] concept document: IPv6 PA/PI unification
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] concept document: IPv6 PA/PI unification
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] concept document: IPv6 PA/PI unification
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin Millnert
millnert at gmail.com
Mon Oct 31 18:44:48 CET 2011
Gert, On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 04:22:50PM +0100, Martin Millnert wrote: >> >> Out-of-the-box counter-proposal: >> >> >> IPRA interacting work (including address space requests) == >> >> [IPRA hour fee] * [IPRA-time spent on application], >> >> Pay per direct load on the hostmasters. This could encourage people >> having more clue interacting with the RIPE NCC and so on. > > ... but backfires if you have a particularily fast or slow IPRA... since > these are humans with differing background, your request might hit one > IPRA that has very much or very little experience on the way *you* want > to roll out your network... or extra curiosity adding more e-mail > rounds... so I'm not sure this can be done in a way that would be > considered "fair". > > Just throwing concerns around. They're fair concerns and does point to a perhaps greater issue: that variance of IPRA's can be that high that it makes a big difference. The system is right now not optimized towards per-hour billing for applications, etc, however, so it's hard to conclude what the variance would be in that situation. > >> >> Infrastructure cost sharing (yearly recurring cost) == >> >> [RIPE NCC specific registry / IPRA related costs] >> >> ----------------------------------------- >> >> number of LIRs at billing year end (*) >> > >> > I'm not sure I get that formula - are you dividing everything by >> > number of LIRs, so everybody pays the same price? (Now that would be >> > simple :) ). >> >> Share *overhead* costs equally, yes. *shrug* :) > > Ah, understood. So the yearly cost would be identically for everybody, > and the initial request is billed for "the real cost caused by it". Right? Well, identical for everybody using the IP registry services - yes. :) Cheers, Martin
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] concept document: IPv6 PA/PI unification
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] concept document: IPv6 PA/PI unification
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]