[address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Fri Sep 23 15:31:18 CEST 2011
On 23/09/2011 14:24, Sander Steffann wrote: > Someone suggested to include such documentation in IPv6 PI requests. > Because this is not actually a policy change (it doesn't change if > someone gets the address space or not) but an implementation issue we > decided to add it as a note to the RIPE NCC. I certainly suggested it as a policy possibility: > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/address-policy-wg/2011/msg00820.html Not sure if others talked about it too. However, there is a substantial difference between "explicitly required to provide evidence" and "to ask for extensive documentation" - the former was suggested because it does materially change the policy. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]