[address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Immo 'FaUl' Wehrenberg
immo.ripe at be.free.de
Thu Jan 5 14:35:09 CET 2012
Gert wrote: > Looking at all the messages that have been posted in the discussions > following my e-mails, I categorize your feedback as follows: [...] > - statements of "we do not have consensus" > (Immo Wehrenberg, on the assumption that consensus has to be unanimous > Remco Van Mook) I'm afraid I have to correct you here. I said that I'm not sure wether we have consensous or not and i would follow Gezas opinion on that. Since Geza has not objected that consensous is reached, I assume that we have consensous now. Just a clarification, sorry that I did not make this clear in the first place. Immo -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20120105/11f4b4c7/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]