[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Wed Nov 7 15:18:48 CET 2012
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 01:45:55PM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 07/11/2012 13:34, LeaderTelecom Ltd. wrote: > > /24 PA works excelent for multihome. I have a lot examples. > > I'm sure it does, until the day that the end user gets into contractual > problems with the PA LIR and wants to move transit provider, but can't do > so easily because they lose the addresses. PI == provider independent. But your original point was: "Because you can't multihome PA addresses." Yes, you can. ;-) Please make your mind about your arguments. Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]