[address-policy-wg] Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Mon Sep 10 09:28:51 CEST 2012
At 09:19 10/09/2012 +0200, Tore Anderson wrote: >* Hank Nussbacher > > > Reading over http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-06 > > > > Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion > > > > 5.0 states "As of 1 July 2011, the RIPE NCC will start allocating enough > > address space to LIRs to meet their needs for a period of up to three > > months." > > > > Can someone explain to me how these two recent allocations fit into this > > rule (extracted from the delegated file): > > > > ripencc|IR|ipv4|5.112.0.0|1048576|20120629|allocated > > ripencc|IR|ipv4|5.208.0.0|1048576|20120904|allocated > >I'm not exactly sure what you're asking here - is there any reason why >they wouldn't «fit into this rule»? > >The LIRs in question had probably used over 80% of their current >allocations (if they had any), documented their need for IPv4 addresses >for the coming three months, and received allocations to cover that >need. 1 million IP addresses needed in a 3 month period? Fascinating. -Hank >In other words, there's probably nothing special about them at >all. It's still more or less business as usual at the NCC, as we've not >yet reached the last /8. > >-- >Tore Anderson >Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]