[address-policy-wg] Policy update request on certification of transferred IPv4 allocations
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy update request on certification of transferred IPv4 allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy update request on certification of transferred IPv4 allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Thu Feb 21 17:27:58 CET 2013
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 04:15:19PM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote: >2.2. re-open the discussion about resource certification at half-cock, >which will lead to a re-run of the same arguments put forward for 2008-08. >The intention of the policy change here is to fix a policy bug, and it >would be a shame to have it ending up as an unnecessary re-hash of 2008-08. Damn. I never looked at it from that angle. Nick is right, this creates RPKI policy by the back-door. >The easiest and simplest thing would be to drop the sentence completely, at >which point the de-facto RIPE NCC procedures concerning certification will >apply. If this seems like a sensible and pragmatic approach to others, I >can oblige from the policy proposal point of view. Or someone else can, if >they want. In light of the above, this is eminently the most sensible solution. cheers, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy update request on certification of transferred IPv4 allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy update request on certification of transferred IPv4 allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]