[address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tore Anderson
tore at fud.no
Wed Apr 23 18:23:21 CEST 2014
* Carsten Schiefner > but those 13 additional /24s and the one /21 (if I am correct) still > wouldn't yet total to five /10s, right? I am too lazy to make the > math myself... :-) Nope. The IANA Recovered IPv4 pool now contains 19.1M addresses, and is 1.9M short of being able to give each RIR a /10. Also worth noting is that LACNIC today marked the equivalent of a /10 reserved in their delegated-extended file (probably in accordance with http://www.lacnic.net/web/lacnic/manual-11), so the "available" space in their registry is now down to 0.4 /8s. That means LACNIC is able to trigger the activation of the pool *right now*, if they so choose. Perhaps they already did and that's why Leo hasn't had time to answer you yet... ;-) Tore
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]