[address-policy-wg] Question about Last /8 Policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Question about Last /8 Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Question about Last /8 Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roger Jørgensen
rogerj at gmail.com
Tue Jul 8 08:37:27 CEST 2014
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Garry Glendown <garry at nethinks.com> wrote: > On 07.07.2014 12:45, Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT) wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This is another topic about Last /8. >> Im seeing in the Listing Service ppl offering their last /22 from the >> 185/8 >> For example, creating a LIR on 1st January cost arround 4.000€ (more >> or less) and selling the whole allocation at currect prices (lets say, >> 8€/IP) is giving you a benefit of ~4.000€ > Generally, I'd +1 this ... > > Anyway, there may be legitimate situations where transfer of the IP > space might be permissable ... In general I would agree to this however there are many legitimate reasons to allow such transfer. And is it really such a big problem? What happen if several smaller ISP's, each with their own network and customer decide to merge... should one of them lose their /22 due to they try to grow? (and just ignore that whole they should go IPv6 because they have that) -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj at gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger at jorgensen.no
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Question about Last /8 Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Question about Last /8 Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]