[address-policy-wg] [ncc-services-wg] Crimea papers
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [ncc-services-wg] Crimea papers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [ncc-services-wg] Crimea papers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ksyu at netassist.ua
ksyu at netassist.ua
Thu Jul 31 13:04:46 CEST 2014
lets see this article http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2014.226.01.0002.01.ENG 29.07.2014 16:45, Richard Hartmann пишет: > Dmitriy, all, > > > as has been stated repeatedly, this is not the place for this discussion. > > The initial question was "will RIPE NCC hand resources to a LIR in > Crimea, based on Russian papers" and the clear answer is "if said > papers establish the existence of the LIR and substantiate the LIR's > claims, yes". > > > I am sure many people hold strong opinions on the topic of Crimea, but > neither RIPE NCC nor RIPE community is the place to discuss this > topic. Does this, and other, situations suck? Yes. Can RIPE NCC do > anything about it? No. > > > As Gert pointed out, what you seem to be arguing for is basically a > punishment for any Crimean LIRs for being located in a region of > conflict. What would that achieve? About as much as the current > discussion. > > > Richard > > PS: There have been and are other conflict regions within RIPE region; > those are not punished for being in the wrong place, either. > > PPS: You are free to try and submit a PDP and/or bring the topic up at > a RIPE meeting, but don't expect consensus. > -- С ув. Ксения Сокол
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [ncc-services-wg] Crimea papers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [ncc-services-wg] Crimea papers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]