[address-policy-wg] 2014-05 New Policy Proposal (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of Internet Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-05 New Policy Proposal (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of Internet Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-05 New Policy Proposal (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of Internet Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Ingvoldstad
frettled at gmail.com
Thu Jun 5 23:25:53 CEST 2014
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Scott Leibrand <scottleibrand at gmail.com> wrote: > Overall, this policy looks good to me. However, I believe there is one > problem with the text. The language regarding recipients in other regions > requires that the recipient be an LIR. However, the transfer policies of > the other regions do not make any such distinction. Therefore, I believe it > would be more appropriate to use the word organization instead of LIR when > referring to recipients in other regions. > That's a fair point. -When Internet number resources are transferred to another RIR, the RIPE NCC will work with the destination RIR to allow the transfer to the receiving LIR. +When Internet number resources are transferred to another RIR, the RIPE NCC will work with the destination RIR to allow the transfer to the receiving organization. Like that? -- Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140605/ae247930/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-05 New Policy Proposal (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of Internet Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-05 New Policy Proposal (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of Internet Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]