[address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Scott Leibrand
scottleibrand at gmail.com
Mon Mar 24 19:43:59 CET 2014
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:24:31AM -0700, Scott Leibrand wrote: > > Would this proposal allow end users to request the transfer of a single > > IPv4 /32? > > Technically, yes, if a) we permit PI transfers (proposal in the works), > and b) the RIPE NCC has given out a /32 PI. > If RIPE NCC has given out a /32 of PI, I'm fine with it being transferable. I'm more concerned about lots of people attempting to carve out and transfer (to end users) IPV4 /32s from larger blocks. Thanks, Scott > > End users reciving PA space have no transfer rights whatsoever, that space > can only transfered by the PA holder (= the LIR). > > Gert Doering > -- APWG chair > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140324/f0b0b04f/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]