[address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Thu May 15 12:13:20 CEST 2014
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:08:14AM +0100, Mailing List Account wrote: >One question though, if the minimum (sub-)/allocation size is >now /24, is the part regarding classless reverse delegation in >the impact statement now obsolete? Never mind, that is in the current policy text. Oh, for proper diffs. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]