[address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Vladimir Andreev
vladimir at quick-soft.net
Thu Apr 23 14:38:35 CEST 2015
I mean official (accepted) documents. For now we also have a discussion :) 23.04.2015, 15:36, "Mikael Abrahamsson" <swmike at swm.pp.se>: > On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Vladimir Andreev wrote: >>> openig a bunch of LIR only for transfering their /22 V4 to another LIR >>> is - and always was - abusing the policy. >> Any links to documents proving it? > > Read the mailing list discussions about the last /8 policy. The /22 per > LIR was always about having new entrants to the market being able to at > least get a little chunk of addresses so they could have NAT444, email > servers etc. > > It was NEVER meant for people to start LIR, get /22, transfer /22, close > LIR, start another LIR, get another /22, transer /22, close LIR, repeat > again and again. If the community wanted it to work that way, the policy > would have been very differently worded. > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se -- With best regards, Vladimir Andreev General director, QuickSoft LLC Tel: +7 903 1750503
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]