[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin Millnert
millnert at gmail.com
Thu Feb 19 19:26:45 CET 2015
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 17:53 +0000, Andy Davidson wrote: > > > On 11 Feb 2015, at 13:46, Marco Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net> wrote: > > > > A proposed change to RIPE Document "IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment > > Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region" is now available for discussion. > > Thanks for your sharing policy proposal idea but I think the > deckchairs would look better on the other side of this mighty > unsinkable ship. I therefore can’t support this proposal. > > Andy I also oppose this proposal. I believe the best thing that can happen is for IPv4 to run out completely, as fast as possible. Increasing the RIPE NCC IPv4 price is counter-productive to that goal. Real market prices will arrive when this happens. I'm generally in favour of any proposal that hastens the run-out of the final /8. /M
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]