[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI assignment policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI assignment policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI assignment policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Vladimir Andreev
vladimir at quick-soft.net
Fri Jun 19 14:23:38 CEST 2015
Another way: 1) Create "inetnum" with type ALLOCATED-BY-LIR inside of "inetnum" allocated by RIPE NCC to LIR; 2) Create "route" object with the same IP prefix as in step 1 and desired AS; 3) Announce your prefix; Also you may need to create at least one ASSIGNED "inetnum" inside ALLOCATED-BY-LIR "inetnum". 19.06.2015, 15:15, "Christopher Kunz" <chrislist at de-punkt.de>: > Am 19.06.15 um 14:06 schrieb Vladimir Andreev: >> Hello! >> >> Why wouldn't they become a LIR? > >>> Small Hotspot providers and especially Freifunk communities typically >>> can not afford a LIR Membership to be independent. In my opinion the >>> current policy makes it hard to adopt IPv6 in such cases. > > As the OP wrote: It's too expensive for a non-profit communal > organisation (typically made up of 3-10 enthusiastic community members > without a real budget) to become a LIR just for the purpose of > connecting one (!) city's Wifi to the world. > > --ck -- With best regards, Vladimir Andreev General director, QuickSoft LLC Tel: +7 903 1750503
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI assignment policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI assignment policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]