[address-policy-wg] aggregating unused allocations
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] aggregating unused allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] aggregating unused allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Thu Mar 19 11:51:12 CET 2015
Hi Antonis - On 19.03.2015 09:54, Antonis Lioumis wrote: > Recently my company got a /22 allocation through the well known transfer > procedure between LIR's. > In the past we also got the /22 we qualify from RIPE NCC's last /8. This > /22 was put aside for future use. > For aggregation purposes we asked RIPE NCC to return both /22 and get > back a /21 but according to current policies this is forbidden. > Since global routing table has exceeded 500000 prefixes and expected to > grow more maybe RIPE community should rethink permitting the exchange of > smaller IPv4 blocks with contiguous one. how about sending text for a policy (change) in this respect? :-) Cheers, Carsten
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] aggregating unused allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] aggregating unused allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]