[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Denis Fondras
ripe at liopen.fr
Fri Apr 15 20:08:23 CEST 2016
> Big LIRs (mean with a lot of v4) provide to small ISPs internet+v4 ranges, > now, how it is possible the new-LIR with only /22 do the same, i know - no > way. > As there is no IPv4 available anymore for free, new-LIR can't become a big-LIR without big expenses (but with IPv6). That's a simple rule any new LIR can (and must) understand. If you read your LIR contract it is stated clearly you won't get more from RIPE. > In other way the small-ISP can become a LIR, this will continue exhaustion > of the last /8 for sure. > If "small-ISP" really wants to play the serious game, it should become LIR anyway. Denis
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]